Anthropic Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised) — side-by-side specs.
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.1 | DeepSeek DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised) | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Release date | Aug 5 2025 | Dec 2024 |
| Model type | — | — |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | — |
Context window | — | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 74.5% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 80.9% | — |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised) shipped 247 days before Claude Opus 4.1 | |
Claude Opus 4.1 and DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised) don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised) shipped 247 days before Claude Opus 4.1, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised) is an open-source / open-weight model; Claude Opus 4.1 is proprietary.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Opus 4.1 and DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised) don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.