Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1M | 400k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $1.25Azure |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $10.00Azure |
| — | $750Azure | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 95.5% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 88% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.0Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | 88% | — |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 88% | — |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 64.5% | — |
OSWorld-VerifiedAgentic computer use — Can the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 85% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Release date | Jun 9 2026 | Nov 19 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude Mythos 5vsGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxvsGemini 4 ArgonClaude Mythos 5vsMuse Spark OpenGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxvsMuse Spark OpenClaude Mythos 5vsGrok 4.7GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxvsGrok 4.7Claude Mythos 5vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude Mythos 5vsMistral Large 4GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxvsMistral Large 4Claude Mythos 5vsKimi K3GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxvsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Claude Mythos 5 and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. GPT-5.1-Codex-Max shipped 202 days before Claude Mythos 5, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Claude Mythos 5) vs 400k (GPT-5.1-Codex-Max).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Mythos 5 and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.