Compare AI models

Specifications
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality.
—>1T
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider.
200k256k
API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it.
—$1.20
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one.
—$6.00
—$540Qwen list price
These models have no shared benchmark scores.
Overview
CompanyAnthropicQwen
Release dateOct 22 2024Sep 24 2025
AccessClosedClosed
Model detailsView modelView model

Frequently asked questions

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen3-Max don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Qwen3-Max has a verified first-party API price: $1.20 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Claude 3.5 Haiku. Claude 3.5 Haiku shipped 337 days before Qwen3-Max, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Context windows are 200k (Claude 3.5 Haiku) vs 256k (Qwen3-Max).

Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen3-Max don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.