Claude 1vsQwen2.5
Claude 1 | Qwen2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 72B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 9k | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.36DeepInfra |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $0.40DeepInfra |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Release date | Mar 14 2023 | Sep 19 2024 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Claude 1 and Qwen2.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude 1 shipped 555 days before Qwen2.5, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 9k (Claude 1) vs 128k (Qwen2.5). Claude 1 is proprietary, while Qwen2.5 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 1 and Qwen2.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.