Claude 1vsMistral Medium 3.5
Claude 1 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 128B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 9k | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $1.50 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $7.50 |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 77.6% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Mistral |
| Release date | Mar 14 2023 | Apr 29 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Claude 1 and Mistral Medium 3.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a verified first-party API price: $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Claude 1. Claude 1 shipped 1142 days before Mistral Medium 3.5, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 9k (Claude 1) vs 256k (Mistral Medium 3.5). Claude 1 is proprietary, while Mistral Medium 3.5 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 1 and Mistral Medium 3.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.