Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 32B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | 128k |
| Benchmarks | ||
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | 63.4% | 74.8% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | SpaceXSI |
| Release date | Mar 6 2025 | Feb 17 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
QwQ-32BvsClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 3 minivsClaude Haiku 5.5QwQ-32BvsGPT-6.1 SolGrok 3 minivsGPT-6.1 SolQwQ-32BvsGemini 4 ArgonGrok 3 minivsGemini 4 ArgonQwQ-32BvsMuse Spark OpenGrok 3 minivsMuse Spark OpenQwQ-32BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Grok 3 minivsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017QwQ-32BvsMistral Large 4Grok 3 minivsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Grok 3 mini leads QwQ-32B on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (LiveCodeBench). Grok 3 mini shipped 17 days before QwQ-32B, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 128k (QwQ-32B) vs 128k (Grok 3 mini). QwQ-32B is open weight, while Grok 3 mini is closed.
On LiveCodeBench, Grok 3 mini leads at 74.8% vs QwQ-32B at 63.4%.