Qwen3-NextvsChatGLM-6B
Qwen3-Next | ChatGLM-6B | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 80B | 6B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 256k | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.09DeepInfra | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $1.10DeepInfra | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | Z.ai |
| Release date | Sep 11 2025 | Mar 14 2023 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Qwen3-NextvsClaude Fable 5.1ChatGLM-6BvsClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3-NextvsGPT-6 AstraChatGLM-6BvsGPT-6 AstraQwen3-NextvsGemini 3.8 FlashChatGLM-6BvsGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-NextvsMuse Spark 1.3ChatGLM-6BvsMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3-NextvsGrok 4.6ChatGLM-6BvsGrok 4.6Qwen3-NextvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashChatGLM-6BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Frequently asked questions
Qwen3-Next and ChatGLM-6B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. ChatGLM-6B shipped 912 days before Qwen3-Next, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Qwen3-Next has 80B parameters, while ChatGLM-6B has 6B.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Qwen3-Next and ChatGLM-6B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.