Qwen2.5-MaxvsGLM-4.6
Qwen2.5-Max | GLM-4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 355B |
Context window | 32k | 200k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 68% |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1339 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | Z.ai |
| Release date | Jan 28 2025 | Sep 30 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: Qwen2.5-Max or GLM-4.6?
Qwen2.5-Max and GLM-4.6 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen2.5-Max shipped 245 days before GLM-4.6, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 32k (Qwen2.5-Max) vs 200k (GLM-4.6). Qwen2.5-Max is proprietary, while GLM-4.6 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Qwen2.5-Max and GLM-4.6 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
Qwen2.5-Max was released by Qwen on Jan 28 2025.
GLM-4.6 was released by Z.ai on Sep 30 2025.
Qwen2.5-Max has a 32k context window; GLM-4.6 has 200k.
Qwen2.5-Max is a proprietary model released by Qwen. GLM-4.6 is an open weight model released by Z.ai.
Other comparisons
Qwen2.5-MaxvsClaude Opus 5GLM-4.6vsClaude Opus 5Qwen2.5-MaxvsGPT-5.6 SolGLM-4.6vsGPT-5.6 SolQwen2.5-MaxvsGemini 3.6 FlashGLM-4.6vsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5-MaxvsMuse Spark 1.1GLM-4.6vsMuse Spark 1.1Qwen2.5-MaxvsGrok 4.5GLM-4.6vsGrok 4.5Qwen2.5-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731GLM-4.6vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731