Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 0.5B/1.8B/4B/7B/14B/72B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 32k | 128k |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 74.8% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | SpaceXSI |
| Release date | Feb 4 2024 | Feb 17 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Qwen1.5vsClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 3 minivsClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen1.5vsGPT-6.1 SolGrok 3 minivsGPT-6.1 SolQwen1.5vsGemini 4 ArgonGrok 3 minivsGemini 4 ArgonQwen1.5vsMuse Spark OpenGrok 3 minivsMuse Spark OpenQwen1.5vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Grok 3 minivsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Qwen1.5vsMistral Large 4Grok 3 minivsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Qwen1.5 and Grok 3 mini don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen1.5 shipped 379 days before Grok 3 mini, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 32k (Qwen1.5) vs 128k (Grok 3 mini). Qwen1.5 is open weight, while Grok 3 mini is closed.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Qwen1.5 and Grok 3 mini don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.