o1vsQwQ-32B
o1 | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 32B |
Context window | 200k | 128k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 75.7% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | Dec 5 2024 | Mar 6 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: o1 or QwQ-32B?
o1 and QwQ-32B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. o1 shipped 91 days before QwQ-32B, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 200k (o1) vs 128k (QwQ-32B). o1 is proprietary, while QwQ-32B is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — o1 and QwQ-32B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
o1 was released by OpenAI on Dec 5 2024.
QwQ-32B was released by Qwen on Mar 6 2025.
o1 has a 200k context window; QwQ-32B has 128k.
o1 is a proprietary model released by OpenAI. QwQ-32B is an open weight model released by Qwen.