o1vsQwen3-Coder
o1 | Qwen3-Coder | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 480B |
Context window | 200k | 256k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 75.7% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | Dec 5 2024 | Jul 22 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: o1 or Qwen3-Coder?
o1 and Qwen3-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. o1 shipped 229 days before Qwen3-Coder, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 200k (o1) vs 256k (Qwen3-Coder). o1 is proprietary, while Qwen3-Coder is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — o1 and Qwen3-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
o1 was released by OpenAI on Dec 5 2024.
Qwen3-Coder was released by Qwen on Jul 22 2025.
o1 has a 200k context window; Qwen3-Coder has 256k.
o1 is a proprietary model released by OpenAI. Qwen3-Coder is an open weight model released by Qwen.