GPT-5.4 nanovsQwen3.7-Plus
GPT-5.4 nano | Qwen3.7-Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $0.20 | $0.40 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $1.25 | $1.60 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | $0.02 | — |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.20Azure | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $1.25Azure | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 37.7% | 34.7% |
OSWorld-VerifiedAgentic computer use — Can the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 39% | 73.3% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 14% | — |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 77.7% |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 89.6% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | Mar 17 2026 | Jun 1 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3.7-Plus are evenly matched across the 2 benchmarks they both report (Humanity's Last Exam, OSWorld-Verified). GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper on both input and output: $0.20 vs $0.40 per million input tokens, and $1.25 vs $1.60 per million output tokens. Figures are base-tier rates. GPT-5.4 nano shipped 76 days before Qwen3.7-Plus, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On Humanity's Last Exam · with tools, GPT-5.4 nano leads at 37.7% vs Qwen3.7-Plus at 34.7%. On OSWorld-Verified, Qwen3.7-Plus leads at 73.3% vs GPT-5.4 nano at 39%.
GPT-5.4 nano was released by OpenAI on Mar 17 2026.
Qwen3.7-Plus was released by Qwen on Jun 1 2026.
GPT-5.4 nano leads on Humanity's Last Exam · with tools — GPT-5.4 nano 37.7% vs Qwen3.7-Plus 34.7%.
GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper on both input and output: $0.20 vs $0.40 per million input tokens, and $1.25 vs $1.60 per million output tokens. Figures are base-tier rates. Rates are pay-as-you-go API prices verified on August 18, 2026.