Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 400k | 128k |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 41.4% |
HumanEvalFunction synthesis — 164 small Python problems: the AI is given a function's description and has to write the working function. This was the coding benchmark of the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 era, before the field moved to fixing real bugs in real repositories. Higher is better. | — | 92.4% |
MATH-500Reasoning — accuracy on the 500-problem MATH subset | — | 85.5% |
DROPReasoning — three-shot token F1 on questions requiring reasoning over paragraphs | — | 74.8 |
AIME 2024Reasoning — single-answer accuracy on the 2024 invitational mathematics exam without tools | — | 44.6% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 73.3% |
MMLUGeneral knowledge — A 57-subject multiple-choice exam — history, law, medicine, maths — that was the standard measure of how much a model knows from 2020 until roughly 2024, when frontier scores crowded into the high 80s and labs moved on to harder tests. The scores here were published years apart under different testing setups, so read them as a historical record rather than a like-for-like ranking. Higher is better. | — | 90.8% |
MGSMMultilingual math — solving grade-school word problems translated into multiple languages | — | 90.8% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Release date | Nov 13 2025 | Sep 12 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
GPT-5.1-Codex-MinivsClaude Fable 5.2o1-previewvsClaude Fable 5.2GPT-5.1-Codex-MinivsGemini 4 Carbono1-previewvsGemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.1-Codex-MinivsMuse Embero1-previewvsMuse EmberGPT-5.1-Codex-MinivsGrok 4.7o1-previewvsGrok 4.7GPT-5.1-Codex-MinivsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017o1-previewvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017GPT-5.1-Codex-MinivsMistral Large 4o1-previewvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and o1-preview don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. o1-preview shipped 427 days before GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 400k (GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini) vs 128k (o1-preview).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and o1-preview don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.