Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 400k | 200k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $15.00 | $15.00 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $120.00 | $60.00 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $7.50 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $15.00OpenAI | $15.00OpenAI |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $120.00OpenAI | $60.00OpenAI |
| $9,000OpenAI list price | $6,000OpenAI list price | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 75.7% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Release date | Aug 7 2025 | Dec 5 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5 Pro and o1 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Both charge $15.00 per million input tokens. o1 is cheaper on output: $60.00 vs $120.00 per million tokens. o1 shipped 245 days before GPT-5 Pro, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 400k (GPT-5 Pro) vs 200k (o1).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — GPT-5 Pro and o1 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.