Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | — | 32B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 400k | 32k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $0.05 | — |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $0.40 | — |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | $0.005 | — |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.025OpenAI | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.20OpenAI | — |
| $30.00OpenAI list price | — | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 50% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | Aug 7 2025 | Nov 28 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
GPT-5 nanovsClaude Haiku 5.5QwQ-32B-PreviewvsClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5 nanovsGemini 4 ArgonQwQ-32B-PreviewvsGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5 nanovsMuse Spark OpenQwQ-32B-PreviewvsMuse Spark OpenGPT-5 nanovsGrok 4.7QwQ-32B-PreviewvsGrok 4.7GPT-5 nanovsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017QwQ-32B-PreviewvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017GPT-5 nanovsMistral Large 4QwQ-32B-PreviewvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
GPT-5 nano and QwQ-32B-Preview don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only GPT-5 nano has a verified first-party API price: $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for QwQ-32B-Preview. QwQ-32B-Preview shipped 252 days before GPT-5 nano, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 400k (GPT-5 nano) vs 32k (QwQ-32B-Preview). GPT-5 nano is closed, while QwQ-32B-Preview is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — GPT-5 nano and QwQ-32B-Preview don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.