Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | — | 0.5B/1.5B/3B/7B/14B/32B/72B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 400k | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.36DeepInfra |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $0.40DeepInfra |
| — | $92.00DeepInfra · fp8 | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 39% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | Sep 15 2025 | Sep 19 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
GPT-5-CodexvsClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5vsClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5-CodexvsGemini 4 ArgonQwen2.5vsGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5-CodexvsMuse Spark OpenQwen2.5vsMuse Spark OpenGPT-5-CodexvsGrok 4.7Qwen2.5vsGrok 4.7GPT-5-CodexvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Qwen2.5vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017GPT-5-CodexvsMistral Large 4Qwen2.5vsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
GPT-5-Codex and Qwen2.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen2.5 shipped 361 days before GPT-5-Codex, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 400k (GPT-5-Codex) vs 128k (Qwen2.5). GPT-5-Codex is closed, while Qwen2.5 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — GPT-5-Codex and Qwen2.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.