GPT-4ovsQwen2.5-Coder
GPT-4o | Qwen2.5-Coder | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 32B |
Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 12% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 49.9% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | May 13 2024 | Nov 12 2024 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: GPT-4o or Qwen2.5-Coder?
GPT-4o and Qwen2.5-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. GPT-4o shipped 183 days before Qwen2.5-Coder, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 128k (GPT-4o) vs 128k (Qwen2.5-Coder). GPT-4o is proprietary, while Qwen2.5-Coder is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — GPT-4o and Qwen2.5-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-4o was released by OpenAI on May 13 2024.
Qwen2.5-Coder was released by Qwen on Nov 12 2024.
GPT-4o has a 128k context window; Qwen2.5-Coder has 128k.
GPT-4o is a proprietary model released by OpenAI. Qwen2.5-Coder is an open weight model released by Qwen.
Other comparisons
GPT-4ovsClaude Opus 5Qwen2.5-CodervsClaude Opus 5GPT-4ovsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5-CodervsGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-4ovsMuse Spark 1.1Qwen2.5-CodervsMuse Spark 1.1GPT-4ovsGrok 4.5Qwen2.5-CodervsGrok 4.5GPT-4ovsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen2.5-CodervsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731GPT-4ovsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen2.5-CodervsMistral Medium 3.5