GPT-4.1vsQwen3.7-Plus
GPT-4.1 | Qwen3.7-Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $2.00 | $0.40 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $8.00 | $1.60 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | $0.50 | — |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $2.00Azure | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $8.00Azure | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 54.6% | 77.7% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 14% | — |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 89.6% |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 34.7% |
OSWorld-VerifiedAgentic computer use — Can the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | — | 73.3% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | Apr 14 2025 | Jun 1 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Qwen3.7-Plus leads GPT-4.1 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (SWE-Bench Verified). Qwen3.7-Plus is cheaper on both input and output: $0.40 vs $2.00 per million input tokens, and $1.60 vs $8.00 per million output tokens. Figures are base-tier rates. GPT-4.1 shipped 413 days before Qwen3.7-Plus, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On SWE-Bench Verified, Qwen3.7-Plus leads at 77.7% vs GPT-4.1 at 54.6%.
GPT-4.1 was released by OpenAI on Apr 14 2025.
Qwen3.7-Plus was released by Qwen on Jun 1 2026.
Qwen3.7-Plus leads on SWE-Bench Verified — GPT-4.1 54.6% vs Qwen3.7-Plus 77.7%.
Qwen3.7-Plus is cheaper on both input and output: $0.40 vs $2.00 per million input tokens, and $1.60 vs $8.00 per million output tokens. Figures are base-tier rates. Rates are pay-as-you-go API prices verified on August 18, 2026.