Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 200k | 128k |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 74.8% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | SpaceXSI |
| Release date | May 16 2025 | Feb 17 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
codex-mini-latestvsClaude Fable 5.2Grok 3 minivsClaude Fable 5.2codex-mini-latestvsGemini 4 CarbonGrok 3 minivsGemini 4 Carboncodex-mini-latestvsMuse EmberGrok 3 minivsMuse Embercodex-mini-latestvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Grok 3 minivsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017codex-mini-latestvsMistral Large 4Grok 3 minivsMistral Large 4codex-mini-latestvsKimi K3.1 ProGrok 3 minivsKimi K3.1 ProFrequently asked questions
codex-mini-latest and Grok 3 mini don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Grok 3 mini shipped 88 days before codex-mini-latest, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 200k (codex-mini-latest) vs 128k (Grok 3 mini).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — codex-mini-latest and Grok 3 mini don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.