Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 550B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1M | 32k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.40DeepInfra | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $1.76DeepInfra | — |
| $210DeepInfra · fp4 | — | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 49% | — |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 71.9% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 56.4% | — |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 44.4% | — |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 26.7% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 86.7% | — |
AA Intelligence IndexOverall intelligence — Artificial Analysis composite intelligence index across evals | 48 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | NVIDIA | Qwen |
| Release date | Jun 4 2026 | Jan 28 2025 |
| Access | Open Source | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Nemotron 3 UltravsClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5-MaxvsClaude Haiku 5.5Nemotron 3 UltravsGPT-6.1 SolQwen2.5-MaxvsGPT-6.1 SolNemotron 3 UltravsGemini 4 ArgonQwen2.5-MaxvsGemini 4 ArgonNemotron 3 UltravsMuse Spark OpenQwen2.5-MaxvsMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3 UltravsGrok 4.7Qwen2.5-MaxvsGrok 4.7Nemotron 3 UltravsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Qwen2.5-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Frequently asked questions
Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen2.5-Max don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen2.5-Max shipped 492 days before Nemotron 3 Ultra, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Nemotron 3 Ultra) vs 32k (Qwen2.5-Max). Nemotron 3 Ultra is open source, while Qwen2.5-Max is closed.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen2.5-Max don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.