Kimi K2 (0905)vsQwQ-32B
Kimi K2 (0905) | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 1T | 32B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 256k | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.60Novita | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $2.50Novita | — |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 65.8% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 75.1% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Moonshot AI | Qwen |
| Release date | Sep 5 2025 | Mar 6 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Kimi K2 (0905)vsClaude Fable 5.1QwQ-32BvsClaude Fable 5.1Kimi K2 (0905)vsGPT-6 AstraQwQ-32BvsGPT-6 AstraKimi K2 (0905)vsGemini 3.8 FlashQwQ-32BvsGemini 3.8 FlashKimi K2 (0905)vsMuse Spark 1.3QwQ-32BvsMuse Spark 1.3Kimi K2 (0905)vsGrok 4.6QwQ-32BvsGrok 4.6Kimi K2 (0905)vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwQ-32BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Frequently asked questions
Kimi K2 (0905) and QwQ-32B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. QwQ-32B shipped 183 days before Kimi K2 (0905), so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Kimi K2 (0905) has 1T parameters, while QwQ-32B has 32B. Context windows are 256k (Kimi K2 (0905)) vs 128k (QwQ-32B).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Kimi K2 (0905) and QwQ-32B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.