Kimi K2 (0905)vsQwen2
Kimi K2 (0905) | Qwen2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 1T | 72B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 256k | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.60Novita | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $2.50Novita | — |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 65.8% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 75.1% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Moonshot AI | Qwen |
| Release date | Sep 5 2025 | Jun 6 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Kimi K2 (0905)vsClaude Fable 5.1Qwen2vsClaude Fable 5.1Kimi K2 (0905)vsGPT-6 AstraQwen2vsGPT-6 AstraKimi K2 (0905)vsGemini 3.8 FlashQwen2vsGemini 3.8 FlashKimi K2 (0905)vsMuse Spark 1.3Qwen2vsMuse Spark 1.3Kimi K2 (0905)vsGrok 4.6Qwen2vsGrok 4.6Kimi K2 (0905)vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwen2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Frequently asked questions
Kimi K2 (0905) and Qwen2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen2 shipped 456 days before Kimi K2 (0905), so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Kimi K2 (0905) has 1T parameters, while Qwen2 has 72B. Context windows are 256k (Kimi K2 (0905)) vs 128k (Qwen2).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Kimi K2 (0905) and Qwen2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.