Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 72B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | 32k |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 60.4% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Moonshot AI | Qwen |
| Release date | Jun 17 2025 | Jan 28 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Kimi-DevvsClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5-MaxvsClaude Haiku 5.5Kimi-DevvsGPT-6.1 SolQwen2.5-MaxvsGPT-6.1 SolKimi-DevvsGemini 4 ArgonQwen2.5-MaxvsGemini 4 ArgonKimi-DevvsMuse Spark OpenQwen2.5-MaxvsMuse Spark OpenKimi-DevvsGrok 4.7Qwen2.5-MaxvsGrok 4.7Kimi-DevvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Qwen2.5-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Frequently asked questions
Kimi-Dev and Qwen2.5-Max don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen2.5-Max shipped 140 days before Kimi-Dev, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 128k (Kimi-Dev) vs 32k (Qwen2.5-Max). Kimi-Dev is open weight, while Qwen2.5-Max is closed.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Kimi-Dev and Qwen2.5-Max don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.