Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 72B | 0.5B/1.5B/3B/7B/14B/32B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.66Cloudflare |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $1.00Cloudflare |
| — | $182Cloudflare | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 60.4% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Moonshot AI | Qwen |
| Release date | Jun 17 2025 | Nov 12 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Kimi-DevvsClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5-CodervsClaude Haiku 5.5Kimi-DevvsGPT-6.1 TerraQwen2.5-CodervsGPT-6.1 TerraKimi-DevvsGemini 4 CarbonQwen2.5-CodervsGemini 4 CarbonKimi-DevvsMuse Spark OpenQwen2.5-CodervsMuse Spark OpenKimi-DevvsGrok 4.7Qwen2.5-CodervsGrok 4.7Kimi-DevvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Qwen2.5-CodervsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Frequently asked questions
Kimi-Dev and Qwen2.5-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen2.5-Coder shipped 217 days before Kimi-Dev, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Kimi-Dev has 72B parameters, while Qwen2.5-Coder has 0.5B/1.5B/3B/7B/14B/32B.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Kimi-Dev and Qwen2.5-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.