Compare AI models

Specifications
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality.
12B—
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider.
128k400k
API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it.
—$0.05
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one.
—$0.40
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again.
—$0.005
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page.
—$0.025OpenAI
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input.
—$0.20OpenAI
—$30.00OpenAI list price
Overview
CompanyMistralOpenAI
Release dateSep 11 2024Aug 7 2025
AccessOpen WeightClosed
Model detailsView modelView model

Frequently asked questions

Pixtral 24.09 and GPT-5 nano don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only GPT-5 nano has a verified first-party API price: $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Pixtral 24.09. Pixtral 24.09 shipped 330 days before GPT-5 nano, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Context windows are 128k (Pixtral 24.09) vs 400k (GPT-5 nano). Pixtral 24.09 is open weight, while GPT-5 nano is closed.

Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Pixtral 24.09 and GPT-5 nano don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.