Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 12B | 1T |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.57Novita |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $2.30Novita |
| — | $229Novita · fp8 | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 10% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 65.8% |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 4.7% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 75.1% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | Moonshot AI |
| Release date | Sep 11 2024 | Jul 11 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Pixtral 24.09vsClaude Haiku 5.5Kimi K2vsClaude Haiku 5.5Pixtral 24.09vsGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2vsGPT-6.1 SolPixtral 24.09vsGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2vsGemini 4 ArgonPixtral 24.09vsMuse Spark OpenKimi K2vsMuse Spark OpenPixtral 24.09vsGrok 4.7Kimi K2vsGrok 4.7Pixtral 24.09vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Kimi K2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Frequently asked questions
Pixtral 24.09 and Kimi K2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Pixtral 24.09 shipped 303 days before Kimi K2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Pixtral 24.09 has 12B parameters, while Kimi K2 has 1T. Context windows are 128k (Pixtral 24.09) vs 128k (Kimi K2).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Pixtral 24.09 and Kimi K2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.