Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 119B | 32B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 256k | 32k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $0.15 | — |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $0.60 | — |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.15Mistral | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.60Mistral | — |
| $60.00Mistral list price | — | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 6% | — |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 50% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | Qwen |
| Release date | Mar 16 2026 | Nov 28 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Mistral Small 4vsClaude Haiku 5.5QwQ-32B-PreviewvsClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral Small 4vsGPT-6.1 SolQwQ-32B-PreviewvsGPT-6.1 SolMistral Small 4vsGemini 4 ArgonQwQ-32B-PreviewvsGemini 4 ArgonMistral Small 4vsMuse Spark OpenQwQ-32B-PreviewvsMuse Spark OpenMistral Small 4vsGrok 4.7QwQ-32B-PreviewvsGrok 4.7Mistral Small 4vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017QwQ-32B-PreviewvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Frequently asked questions
Mistral Small 4 and QwQ-32B-Preview don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Mistral Small 4 has a verified first-party API price: $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for QwQ-32B-Preview. QwQ-32B-Preview shipped 473 days before Mistral Small 4, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Mistral Small 4 has 119B parameters, while QwQ-32B-Preview has 32B. Context windows are 256k (Mistral Small 4) vs 32k (QwQ-32B-Preview). Mistral Small 4 is closed, while QwQ-32B-Preview is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Mistral Small 4 and QwQ-32B-Preview don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.