Mistral NeMovsQwen3-Next
Mistral NeMo | Qwen3-Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 12B | 80B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 128k | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.018DekaLLM | $0.09DeepInfra |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.03DeepInfra | $1.10DeepInfra |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | Qwen |
| Release date | Jul 18 2024 | Sep 11 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Mistral NeMovsClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3-NextvsClaude Fable 5.1Mistral NeMovsGPT-6 AstraQwen3-NextvsGPT-6 AstraMistral NeMovsGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-NextvsGemini 3.8 FlashMistral NeMovsMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3-NextvsMuse Spark 1.3Mistral NeMovsGrok 4.6Qwen3-NextvsGrok 4.6Mistral NeMovsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwen3-NextvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Frequently asked questions
Mistral NeMo and Qwen3-Next don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Mistral NeMo shipped 420 days before Qwen3-Next, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Mistral NeMo has 12B parameters, while Qwen3-Next has 80B. Context windows are 128k (Mistral NeMo) vs 256k (Qwen3-Next).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Mistral NeMo and Qwen3-Next don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.