Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 12B | 480B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.0166Io Net | $0.30DeepInfra |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.0216Io Net | $1.00DeepInfra |
| $4.40Io Net · fp16 | $110DeepInfra · turbo · fp4 | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 20% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | Qwen |
| Release date | Jul 18 2024 | Jul 22 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Mistral NeMovsClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3-CodervsClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral NeMovsGPT-6.1 TerraQwen3-CodervsGPT-6.1 TerraMistral NeMovsGemini 4 CarbonQwen3-CodervsGemini 4 CarbonMistral NeMovsMuse Spark OpenQwen3-CodervsMuse Spark OpenMistral NeMovsGrok 4.7Qwen3-CodervsGrok 4.7Mistral NeMovsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Qwen3-CodervsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Frequently asked questions
Mistral NeMo and Qwen3-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Mistral NeMo shipped 369 days before Qwen3-Coder, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Mistral NeMo has 12B parameters, while Qwen3-Coder has 480B. Context windows are 128k (Mistral NeMo) vs 256k (Qwen3-Coder).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Mistral NeMo and Qwen3-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.