Compare AI models

Specifications
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one.
12B74B
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view.
128k—
API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page.
$0.0166Io Net—
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input.
$0.0216Io Net—
$4.40Io Net · fp16—
These models have no shared benchmark scores.
Overview
CompanyMistralNVIDIA
Release dateJul 18 2024Oct 15 2026
AccessOpen WeightOpen Weight
Model detailsView modelView model

Frequently asked questions

Mistral NeMo and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Mistral NeMo shipped 819 days before Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Mistral NeMo has 12B parameters, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B has 74B.

Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Mistral NeMo and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.