Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 128B | 480B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 256k | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $1.50 | $1.00 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $7.50 | $5.00 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $1.50Mistral | $0.22Google |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $7.50Mistral | $1.00DeepInfra |
These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 20% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 77.6% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | Qwen |
| Release date | Apr 29 2026 | Jul 22 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Mistral Medium 3.5vsClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3-CodervsClaude Sonnet 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5vsGPT-6.1 SolQwen3-CodervsGPT-6.1 SolMistral Medium 3.5vsGemini 4 ArgonQwen3-CodervsGemini 4 ArgonMistral Medium 3.5vsMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3-CodervsMuse Spark 1.3Mistral Medium 3.5vsGrok 4.7Qwen3-CodervsGrok 4.7Mistral Medium 3.5vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwen3-CodervsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashFrequently asked questions
Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen3-Coder is cheaper on both input and output: $1.00 vs $1.50 per million input tokens, and $5.00 vs $7.50 per million output tokens. Figures are base-tier rates. Qwen3-Coder shipped 281 days before Mistral Medium 3.5, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Mistral Medium 3.5 has 128B parameters, while Qwen3-Coder has 480B. Context windows are 256k (Mistral Medium 3.5) vs 256k (Qwen3-Coder).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.