Mistral Medium 3.5vsQwen-72B
Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 128B | 72B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 256k | 32k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $1.50 | — |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $7.50 | — |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 77.6% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | Qwen |
| Release date | Apr 29 2026 | Nov 30 2023 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Mistral Medium 3.5vsClaude Fable 5.1Qwen-72BvsClaude Fable 5.1Mistral Medium 3.5vsGPT-6 AstraQwen-72BvsGPT-6 AstraMistral Medium 3.5vsGemini 3.8 FlashQwen-72BvsGemini 3.8 FlashMistral Medium 3.5vsMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-72BvsMuse Spark 1.3Mistral Medium 3.5vsGrok 4.6Qwen-72BvsGrok 4.6Mistral Medium 3.5vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwen-72BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Frequently asked questions
Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen-72B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a verified first-party API price: $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Qwen-72B. Qwen-72B shipped 881 days before Mistral Medium 3.5, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Mistral Medium 3.5 has 128B parameters, while Qwen-72B has 72B. Context windows are 256k (Mistral Medium 3.5) vs 32k (Qwen-72B).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen-72B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.