Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 128B | 74B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 256k | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $1.50 | — |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $7.50 | — |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $1.50Mistral | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $7.50Mistral | — |
| $675Mistral list price | — | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 77.6% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | — | 50.98% |
MCP AtlasMulti-step tool use — Can the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 52.2% |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 66.75% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 86.43% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | NVIDIA |
| Release date | Apr 29 2026 | Oct 15 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Mistral Medium 3.5vsClaude Haiku 5.5Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5vsGPT-6.1 SolNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsGPT-6.1 SolMistral Medium 3.5vsGemini 4 ArgonNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsGemini 4 ArgonMistral Medium 3.5vsMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsMuse Spark OpenMistral Medium 3.5vsGrok 4.7Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsGrok 4.7Mistral Medium 3.5vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashFrequently asked questions
Mistral Medium 3.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a verified first-party API price: $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B. Mistral Medium 3.5 shipped 169 days before Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Mistral Medium 3.5 has 128B parameters, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B has 74B.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Mistral Medium 3.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.