Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 816B | 253B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 1M | — |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 60% | — |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 66.3% |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 76.4% | — |
MCP AtlasMulti-step tool use — Can the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 89.2% | — |
JobBenchProfessional tool use — Tests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | 61.8% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 76% |
GDPval-AA v2Knowledge work — economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | 1401 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | NVIDIA |
| Release date | Oct 15 2026 | Apr 8 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Muse Spark OpenvsClaude Haiku 5.5Llama Nemotron Ultra 253BvsClaude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark OpenvsGPT-6.1 SolLlama Nemotron Ultra 253BvsGPT-6.1 SolMuse Spark OpenvsGemini 4 ArgonLlama Nemotron Ultra 253BvsGemini 4 ArgonMuse Spark OpenvsGrok 4.7Llama Nemotron Ultra 253BvsGrok 4.7Muse Spark OpenvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLlama Nemotron Ultra 253BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMuse Spark OpenvsMistral Large 4Llama Nemotron Ultra 253BvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark Open and Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B shipped 555 days before Muse Spark Open, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Muse Spark Open has 816B parameters, while Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B has 253B.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Muse Spark Open and Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.