Muse Spark 1.2vsQwen3-Coder
Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3-Coder | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 480B |
Context window | 1M | 256k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 59.3% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 82.9% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Qwen |
| Release date | Aug 5 2026 | Jul 22 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3-Coder?
Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen3-Coder shipped 379 days before Muse Spark 1.2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Muse Spark 1.2) vs 256k (Qwen3-Coder). Muse Spark 1.2 is proprietary, while Qwen3-Coder is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark 1.2 was released by Meta on Aug 5 2026.
Qwen3-Coder was released by Qwen on Jul 22 2025.
Muse Spark 1.2 has a 1M context window; Qwen3-Coder has 256k.
Muse Spark 1.2 is a proprietary model released by Meta. Qwen3-Coder is an open weight model released by Qwen.