Muse Spark 1.2vsQwen3
Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 235B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 1M | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $0.70 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $2.80 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $1.25Meta | $0.0482StreamLake |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $4.25Meta | $0.1931StreamLake |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 50% | — |
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 59.3% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 82.9% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Qwen |
| Release date | Aug 5 2026 | Apr 29 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Muse Spark 1.2vsClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3vsClaude Fable 5.1Muse Spark 1.2vsGPT-6 AstraQwen3vsGPT-6 AstraMuse Spark 1.2vsGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3vsGemini 3.8 FlashMuse Spark 1.2vsGrok 4.6Qwen3vsGrok 4.6Muse Spark 1.2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwen3vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMuse Spark 1.2vsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3vsMistral Medium 3.5
Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Qwen3 has a verified first-party API price: $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Muse Spark 1.2. Qwen3 shipped 463 days before Muse Spark 1.2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Muse Spark 1.2) vs 128k (Qwen3). Muse Spark 1.2 is proprietary, while Qwen3 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.