Muse Spark 1.2vsQwen2.5-Coder
Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen2.5-Coder | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 32B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 1M | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $1.25Meta | $0.66Cloudflare |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $4.25Meta | $1.00Cloudflare |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 50% | — |
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 59.3% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 82.9% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Qwen |
| Release date | Aug 5 2026 | Nov 12 2024 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Muse Spark 1.2vsClaude Fable 5.1Qwen2.5-CodervsClaude Fable 5.1Muse Spark 1.2vsGPT-6 AstraQwen2.5-CodervsGPT-6 AstraMuse Spark 1.2vsGemini 3.8 FlashQwen2.5-CodervsGemini 3.8 FlashMuse Spark 1.2vsGrok 4.6Qwen2.5-CodervsGrok 4.6Muse Spark 1.2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwen2.5-CodervsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMuse Spark 1.2vsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen2.5-CodervsMistral Medium 3.5
Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen2.5-Coder shipped 631 days before Muse Spark 1.2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Muse Spark 1.2) vs 128k (Qwen2.5-Coder). Muse Spark 1.2 is proprietary, while Qwen2.5-Coder is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.