Muse Spark 1.1vsQwen3.8-Max
Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.8-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 2.4T |
Context window | — | 1M |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 61.5% | 67.7%Best |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 53.3% | — |
Research reproduction PaperBenchreproducing the results of an ML research paper end to end | — | 93% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 80% | 86.6%Best |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 88.1% | — |
Professional tool use JobBenchTests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | 54.7%Best | 53.4% |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 75.6% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 62.1% | — |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 80.8% | 86.1%Best |
Agentic financial analysis Finance Agent v2Tests the AI on real financial-analysis work, like digging through reports and making sound decisions. Higher is better. | 57.2% | — |
Agentic legal work Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkHarvey's test of whether an AI agent can complete real legal work — drafting and reviewing documents, working with spreadsheets and presentations, and navigating files the way a lawyer's assistant would. Higher is better. | 20% | — |
Tax questions TaxEval v2A set of real tax questions created by Vals AI — can the AI give accurate answers about tax rules and filings? Higher is better. | 79.72% | — |
Medical admin work MedScribeCan the AI support doctors with their administrative work, like notes and paperwork? Created by Vals AI. Higher is better. | 88.89% | — |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | 88.4% | 88.4% |
Visual reasoning BabyVisionTests core visual reasoning — seeing and understanding images the way even young children can, which AIs often find surprisingly hard. Higher is better. | 76.3% | 82%Best |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | 1490 | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1540 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Qwen |
| Release date | Jul 9 2026 | Aug 3 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8-Max?
Qwen3.8-Max leads Muse Spark 1.1 on 4 of the 6 benchmarks they both report. Muse Spark 1.1 shipped 25 days before Qwen3.8-Max, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On SWE-Bench Pro, Qwen3.8-Max leads at 67.7% vs Muse Spark 1.1 at 61.5%. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Qwen3.8-Max leads at 86.6% vs Muse Spark 1.1 at 80%. On JobBench, Muse Spark 1.1 leads at 54.7% vs Qwen3.8-Max at 53.4%. On OSWorld-Verified, Qwen3.8-Max leads at 86.1% vs Muse Spark 1.1 at 80.8%. On CharXiv Reasoning, both models score 88.4%. On BabyVision, Qwen3.8-Max leads at 82% vs Muse Spark 1.1 at 76.3%.
Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark 1.1 was released by Meta on Jul 9 2026.
Qwen3.8-Max was released by Qwen on Aug 3 2026.
Qwen3.8-Max leads on SWE-Bench Pro — Muse Spark 1.1 61.5% vs Qwen3.8-Max 67.7%.
Other comparisons
Muse Spark 1.1vsClaude Opus 5Qwen3.8-MaxvsClaude Opus 5Muse Spark 1.1vsGPT-5.6 SolQwen3.8-MaxvsGPT-5.6 SolMuse Spark 1.1vsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3.8-MaxvsGemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.1vsGrok 4.5Qwen3.8-MaxvsGrok 4.5Muse Spark 1.1vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen3.8-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Muse Spark 1.1vsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8-MaxvsMistral Medium 3.5