Compare AI models

Specifications
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality.
109B480B
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider.
10M256k
API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page.
$0.08DeepInfra$0.30DeepInfra
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input.
$0.24DeepInfra$1.00DeepInfra
$35.00DeepInfra · fp8$110DeepInfra · turbo · fp4
Benchmarks
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better.
20%20%
Overview
CompanyMetaQwen
Release dateApr 5 2025Jul 22 2025
AccessOpen WeightOpen Weight
Model detailsView modelView model

Frequently asked questions

LLaMA 4 Scout and Qwen3-Coder are evenly matched across the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). LLaMA 4 Scout shipped 108 days before Qwen3-Coder, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

LLaMA 4 Scout has 109B parameters, while Qwen3-Coder has 480B. Context windows are 10M (LLaMA 4 Scout) vs 256k (Qwen3-Coder).

On BullshitBench v2, both models score 20%.