LLaMA 4 ScoutvsMistral Medium 3.5
LLaMA 4 Scout | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 128B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $1.50 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $7.50 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.10DeepInfra | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.30DeepInfra | — |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 20% | — |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 77.6% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Mistral |
| Release date | Apr 5 2025 | Apr 29 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
LLaMA 4 ScoutvsClaude Fable 5.1Mistral Medium 3.5vsClaude Fable 5.1LLaMA 4 ScoutvsGPT-6 AstraMistral Medium 3.5vsGPT-6 AstraLLaMA 4 ScoutvsGemini 3.8 FlashMistral Medium 3.5vsGemini 3.8 FlashLLaMA 4 ScoutvsGrok 4.6Mistral Medium 3.5vsGrok 4.6LLaMA 4 ScoutvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMistral Medium 3.5vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLLaMA 4 ScoutvsKimi K3Mistral Medium 3.5vsKimi K3
Frequently asked questions
LLaMA 4 Scout and Mistral Medium 3.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a verified first-party API price: $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for LLaMA 4 Scout. LLaMA 4 Scout shipped 389 days before Mistral Medium 3.5, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — LLaMA 4 Scout and Mistral Medium 3.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.