Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 400B | 253B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1M | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.1875DigitalOcean | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.6525DigitalOcean | — |
| $70.13DigitalOcean | — | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 29% | — |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 66.3% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 76% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | NVIDIA |
| Release date | Apr 5 2025 | Apr 8 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
LLaMA 4 MaverickvsClaude Haiku 5.5Llama Nemotron Ultra 253BvsClaude Haiku 5.5LLaMA 4 MaverickvsGPT-6.1 SolLlama Nemotron Ultra 253BvsGPT-6.1 SolLLaMA 4 MaverickvsGemini 4 ArgonLlama Nemotron Ultra 253BvsGemini 4 ArgonLLaMA 4 MaverickvsGrok 4.7Llama Nemotron Ultra 253BvsGrok 4.7LLaMA 4 MaverickvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Llama Nemotron Ultra 253BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017LLaMA 4 MaverickvsMistral Large 4Llama Nemotron Ultra 253BvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
LLaMA 4 Maverick and Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. LLaMA 4 Maverick shipped 3 days before Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
LLaMA 4 Maverick has 400B parameters, while Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B has 253B. Context windows are 1M (LLaMA 4 Maverick) vs 128k (Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — LLaMA 4 Maverick and Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.