Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 1B/3B/11B/90B | 314B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | 8k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.027Cloudflare | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.201Cloudflare | — |
| $15.45Cloudflare | — | |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | SpaceXSI |
| Release date | Sep 25 2024 | Nov 3 2023 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
LLaMA 3.2vsClaude Haiku 5.5Grok‑1vsClaude Haiku 5.5LLaMA 3.2vsGPT-6.1 SolGrok‑1vsGPT-6.1 SolLLaMA 3.2vsGemini 4 ArgonGrok‑1vsGemini 4 ArgonLLaMA 3.2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Grok‑1vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017LLaMA 3.2vsMistral Large 4Grok‑1vsMistral Large 4LLaMA 3.2vsKimi K3Grok‑1vsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
LLaMA 3.2 and Grok‑1 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Grok‑1 shipped 327 days before LLaMA 3.2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
LLaMA 3.2 has 1B/3B/11B/90B parameters, while Grok‑1 has 314B. Context windows are 128k (LLaMA 3.2) vs 8k (Grok‑1).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — LLaMA 3.2 and Grok‑1 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.