Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 1B/3B/11B/90B | 72B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | 32k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.027Cloudflare | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.201Cloudflare | — |
| $15.45Cloudflare | — | |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Qwen |
| Release date | Sep 25 2024 | Nov 30 2023 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
LLaMA 3.2vsClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen-72BvsClaude Haiku 5.5LLaMA 3.2vsGPT-6.1 TerraQwen-72BvsGPT-6.1 TerraLLaMA 3.2vsGemini 4 CarbonQwen-72BvsGemini 4 CarbonLLaMA 3.2vsGrok 4.7Qwen-72BvsGrok 4.7LLaMA 3.2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Qwen-72BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017LLaMA 3.2vsMistral Large 4Qwen-72BvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
LLaMA 3.2 and Qwen-72B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen-72B shipped 300 days before LLaMA 3.2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
LLaMA 3.2 has 1B/3B/11B/90B parameters, while Qwen-72B has 72B. Context windows are 128k (LLaMA 3.2) vs 32k (Qwen-72B).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — LLaMA 3.2 and Qwen-72B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.