Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 1B/3B/11B/90B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $1.10 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $4.40 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.55 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.027Cloudflare | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.201Cloudflare | — |
| $15.45Cloudflare | $440OpenAI list price | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 60% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | OpenAI |
| Release date | Sep 25 2024 | Sep 12 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
LLaMA 3.2vsClaude Haiku 5.5o1-minivsClaude Haiku 5.5LLaMA 3.2vsGemini 4 Argono1-minivsGemini 4 ArgonLLaMA 3.2vsGrok 4.7o1-minivsGrok 4.7LLaMA 3.2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017o1-minivsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017LLaMA 3.2vsMistral Large 4o1-minivsMistral Large 4LLaMA 3.2vsKimi K3o1-minivsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
LLaMA 3.2 and o1-mini don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only o1-mini has a verified first-party API price: $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for LLaMA 3.2. o1-mini shipped 13 days before LLaMA 3.2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 128k (LLaMA 3.2) vs 128k (o1-mini). LLaMA 3.2 is open weight, while o1-mini is closed.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — LLaMA 3.2 and o1-mini don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.