LLaMA 3.1vsGrok 4.6
LLaMA 3.1 | Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 14% | — |
Agentic coding CursorBench v3.2Cursor's own test of harder, real-world coding tasks inside a code editor, on the refreshed v3.2 task set. Scores aren't comparable with v3.1. Higher is better. | — | 69.9% |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 65.9% |
Agentic coding FrontierCode v1.1 (Extended) · extended splitfrontier-difficulty agentic coding tasks (v1.1, extended split) | — | 61.3% |
Expert software engineering APEX-SWEexpert-level software-engineering tasks (AI Productivity Index) | — | 56.4% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 3.0command-line task completion (v3.0, much harder task set) | — | 26% |
Expert agentic work APEX-Agentsexpert-level agentic work tasks (AI Productivity Index) | — | 57.5% |
Agentic legal work Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkHarvey's test of whether an AI agent can complete real legal work — drafting and reviewing documents, working with spreadsheets and presentations, and navigating files the way a lawyer's assistant would. Higher is better. | — | 15.8% |
Overall intelligence AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis composite intelligence index across evals | — | 61 |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | — | 1753 |
Knowledge work AA-BriefcaseArtificial Analysis agentic office-work eval (Elo) | — | 1577 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | SpaceXAI |
| Release date | Jul 23 2024 | Aug 12 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Proprietary |
Which is better: LLaMA 3.1 or Grok 4.6?
LLaMA 3.1 and Grok 4.6 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. LLaMA 3.1 shipped 750 days before Grok 4.6, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
LLaMA 3.1 is open weight, while Grok 4.6 is proprietary.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — LLaMA 3.1 and Grok 4.6 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
LLaMA 3.1 was released by Meta on Jul 23 2024.
Grok 4.6 was released by SpaceXAI on Aug 12 2026.
LLaMA 3.1 is an open weight model released by Meta. Grok 4.6 is a proprietary model released by SpaceXAI.
Other comparisons
LLaMA 3.1vsClaude Opus 5Grok 4.6vsClaude Opus 5LLaMA 3.1vsGPT-5.6-CyberGrok 4.6vsGPT-5.6-CyberLLaMA 3.1vsGemini 3.7 FlashGrok 4.6vsGemini 3.7 FlashLLaMA 3.1vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Grok 4.6vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813LLaMA 3.1vsMistral Medium 3.5Grok 4.6vsMistral Medium 3.5LLaMA 3.1vsKimi K3Grok 4.6vsKimi K3