Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 5.1B/8B/26B/31B | 74B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 256k | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.042Darkbloom | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.18Makora | — |
| $19.40Darkbloom | — | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 25% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | — | 50.98% |
MCP AtlasMulti-step tool use — Can the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 52.2% |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 66.75% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 86.43% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | NVIDIA | |
| Release date | Apr 2 2026 | Oct 15 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Gemma 4vsClaude Haiku 5.5Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemma 4vsGPT-6.1 SolNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsGPT-6.1 SolGemma 4vsMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsMuse Spark OpenGemma 4vsGrok 4.7Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsGrok 4.7Gemma 4vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Gemma 4vsMistral Large 4Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Gemma 4 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Gemma 4 shipped 196 days before Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Gemma 4 has 5.1B/8B/26B/31B parameters, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B has 74B. Context windows are 256k (Gemma 4) vs 256k (Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemma 4 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.