AI Model Release Tracker

Compare AI models

Specifications
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality.
9B/27B12B
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider.
8k128k
API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page.
$0.65NextBit$0.0166Io Net
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input.
$0.65NextBit$0.0216Io Net
$163NextBit · int4$4.40Io Net · fp16
Overview
CompanyGoogleMistral
Release dateJun 27 2024Jul 18 2024
AccessOpen WeightOpen Weight
Model detailsView modelView model

Other comparisons

Gemma 2vsClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral NeMovsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemma 2vsGPT-6.1 SolMistral NeMovsGPT-6.1 SolGemma 2vsMuse Spark OpenMistral NeMovsMuse Spark OpenGemma 2vsGrok 4.7Mistral NeMovsGrok 4.7Gemma 2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Mistral NeMovsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Gemma 2vsKimi K3Mistral NeMovsKimi K3

Frequently asked questions

Gemma 2 and Mistral NeMo don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Gemma 2 shipped 21 days before Mistral NeMo, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Gemma 2 has 9B/27B parameters, while Mistral NeMo has 12B. Context windows are 8k (Gemma 2) vs 128k (Mistral NeMo).

Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemma 2 and Mistral NeMo don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.