Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 2B/7B | 12B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 8k | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.0166Io Net |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $0.0216Io Net |
| — | $4.40Io Net · fp16 | |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | |
| Release date | Feb 21 2024 | Jul 18 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Gemma 1vsClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral NeMovsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemma 1vsGPT-6.1 SolMistral NeMovsGPT-6.1 SolGemma 1vsMuse Spark OpenMistral NeMovsMuse Spark OpenGemma 1vsGrok 4.7Mistral NeMovsGrok 4.7Gemma 1vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Mistral NeMovsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Gemma 1vsKimi K3Mistral NeMovsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Gemma 1 and Mistral NeMo don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Gemma 1 shipped 148 days before Mistral NeMo, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Gemma 1 has 2B/7B parameters, while Mistral NeMo has 12B. Context windows are 8k (Gemma 1) vs 128k (Mistral NeMo).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemma 1 and Mistral NeMo don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.