Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 128B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $1.50 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $7.50 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $1.50Mistral |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $7.50Mistral |
These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 77.6% |
CyberGymCybersecurity — Tests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | 77.5% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | |
| Release date | Jul 21 2026 | Apr 29 2026 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Gemini 3.5 Flash CybervsClaude Sonnet 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5vsClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3.5 Flash CybervsGPT-6.1 SolMistral Medium 3.5vsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.5 Flash CybervsMuse Spark 1.3Mistral Medium 3.5vsMuse Spark 1.3Gemini 3.5 Flash CybervsGrok 4.7Mistral Medium 3.5vsGrok 4.7Gemini 3.5 Flash CybervsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMistral Medium 3.5vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGemini 3.5 Flash CybervsKimi K3Mistral Medium 3.5vsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Mistral Medium 3.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a verified first-party API price: $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber. Mistral Medium 3.5 shipped 83 days before Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is closed, while Mistral Medium 3.5 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Mistral Medium 3.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.