AI Model Release Tracker

Compare AI models

Specifications
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality.
—12B
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider.
2M128k
API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page.
—$0.0166Io Net
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input.
—$0.0216Io Net
—$4.40Io Net · fp16
Overview
CompanyGoogleMistral
Release dateFeb 5 2025Jul 18 2024
AccessClosedOpen Weight
Model detailsView modelView model

Other comparisons

Gemini 2.0 ProvsClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral NeMovsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.0 ProvsGPT-6.1 SolMistral NeMovsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 2.0 ProvsMuse Spark OpenMistral NeMovsMuse Spark OpenGemini 2.0 ProvsGrok 4.7Mistral NeMovsGrok 4.7Gemini 2.0 ProvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Mistral NeMovsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Gemini 2.0 ProvsKimi K3Mistral NeMovsKimi K3

Frequently asked questions

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral NeMo don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Mistral NeMo shipped 202 days before Gemini 2.0 Pro, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Context windows are 2M (Gemini 2.0 Pro) vs 128k (Mistral NeMo). Gemini 2.0 Pro is closed, while Mistral NeMo is open weight.

Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral NeMo don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.